#
Tag Archives: quantum mechanics

Speaking of Bell tests, I’ve noticed that science writers often struggle to find a good metaphor that illustrates just what’s so weird about the correlation between entangled particles. **Bell tests** are complex, and because they squat in the middle of quantum weirdness, they’re hard to explain in any classical terms.

I thought I had the beginnings of a good metaphor, at least the classical part. But the quantum part is definitely a challenge. (All the more so because I’m still not entirely clear on the deep details of **Bell’s theorem** myself.)

Worse, I think my metaphor fails the ping-pong ball test.

Continue reading

35 Comments | tags: particles, quantum mechanics, Bell's Theorem | posted in Brain Bubble, Physics

Last time I explored the quantum spin of photons, which manifests as the **polarization of light**. (Note that all forms of light can be polarized. That includes radio waves, microwaves, IR, UV, x-rays, and gamma rays. Spin — polarization — is a fundamental property of photons.)

I left off with some simple experiments that demonstrated the basic behavior of polarized light. They were simple enough to be done at home with pairs of sunglasses, yet they demonstrate the counter-intuitive nature of quantum mechanics.

Here I’ll dig more into those and other experiments.

Continue reading

8 Comments | tags: quantum mechanics, Bell's Theorem, photons, QM101 | posted in Physics

I finished *The Quantum Labyrinth: How Richard Feynman and John Wheeler Revolutionized Time and Reality* (2017), by **Paul Halpern**. As the title implies, the book revolves around the careers and lives of John A. Wheeler (1911–2008) and Richard Feynman (1918–1988). After Feynman graduated from MIT he became Wheeler’s teaching assistant at Princeton. The two men, despite very different personalities, became life-long friends and collaborators.

One of Wheeler’s many claims to fame is his promotion of Hugh Everett’s PhD thesis, *The Theory of the Universal Wave Function*. That paper, of course, is the seed from which grew the **Many Worlds Interpretation** of Quantum Mechanics.

The thing is, there are two major versions of the MWI.

Continue reading

3 Comments | tags: Many Worlds Interpretation, Paul Halpern, quantum mechanics, Sabine Hossenfelder | posted in Brain Bubble, Physics

I’m two-thirds through my second **Paul Halpern** book this month. Earlier I read his book about cosmology, *Edge of the Universe: A Voyage to the Cosmic Horizon and Beyond* (2012), which was okay. Now I’m reading *The Quantum Labyrinth: How Richard Feynman and John Wheeler Revolutionized Time and Reality* (2017), which I’m enjoying a bit more. In part because cosmology has changed more since 2012 than quantum physics has since 2017. (Arguably, the latter hasn’t changed much since the 1960s.)

I wrote about Halpern’s book, *Einstein’s Dice and Schrödinger’s Cat* (2015), last year. As the title implies, it focuses on two great names from physics. *Quantum Labyrinth* (as its title also implies) also focuses on two great physics names.

But today’s Brain Bubble (as the title implies) is about **wavefunction collapse**.

Continue reading

9 Comments | tags: Paul Halpern, quantum mechanics, Schrödinger Equation, wave-function | posted in Brain Bubble, Physics

When I was in high school, bras were of great interest to me — mostly in regards to trying to remove them from my girlfriends. That was my errant youth and it slightly tickles my sense of the absurd that they’ve once again become a topic of interest, although in this case it’s a whole other kind of bra.

These days it’s all about Paul Dirac’s useful **Bra-Ket notation**, which is used throughout quantum mechanics. I’ve used it a bit in this series, and I thought it was high time to dig into the details.

Understanding them is one of the many important steps to climb.

Continue reading

5 Comments | tags: bra-ket notation, inner product, matrix multiplication, outer product, QM101, quantum mechanics | posted in Math, Physics

One small hill I had to climb involved the object I’ve been using as the header image in these posts. It’s called the **Bloch sphere**, and it depicts a two-level quantum system. It’s heavily used in quantum computing because qubits typically are two-level systems.

So is **quantum spin**, which I wrote about last time. The sphere idea dates back to 1892 when Henri Poincaré defined the Poincaré sphere to describe light polarization (which is the quantum spin of photons).

All in all, it’s a handy device for visualizing these quantum states.

Continue reading

4 Comments | tags: Bloch sphere, QM101, quantum computing, quantum mechanics, quantum spin | posted in Math, Physics

Popular treatments of quantum mechanics often treat **quantum spin** lightly. It reminds me of the weak force, which science writers often mention only in passing as *‘related to radioactive decay’* (true enough). There’s an implication it’s too complicated to explain.

With quantum spin, the handwave is that it is *‘similar to classical angular momentum’* (similar to actual physical spinning objects), but different in mysterious quantum ways too complicated to explain.

Ironically, it’s one of the simpler quantum systems, mathematically.

Continue reading

35 Comments | tags: QM101, quantum mechanics, quantum spin | posted in Math, Physics

Unless one has a strong mathematical background, one new and perhaps puzzling concept in quantum mechanics is all the talk of *eigenvalues* and *eigenvectors*.

Making it even more confusing is that physicists tend to call eigenvectors *eigenstates* or *eigenfunctions*, and sometimes even refer to an *eigenbasis*.

So the obvious first question is, “What (or who) is an *eigen*?” (It turns out to be a what. In this case there was no famous physicist named Eigen.)

Continue reading

13 Comments | tags: eigenstate, eigenvalue, eigenvector, matrix transform, QM101, quantum mechanics | posted in Math, Physics

In quantum mechanics, one hears much talk about *operators*. The Wikipedia page for operators (a good page to know for those interested in QM) first has a section about operators in classical mechanics. The larger quantum section begins by saying: *“The mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics (QM) is built upon the concept of an operator.”*

Operators represent the *observables* of a quantum system. All measurable properties are represented mathematically by an operator.

But they’re a bit difficult to explain with plain words.

Continue reading

4 Comments | tags: QM101, quantum mechanics, quantum operator | posted in Math, Physics

Last time I set the stage, the mathematical location for quantum mechanics, a complex vector space (Hilbert space) where the vectors represent quantum states. (A wave-function defines where the vector is in the space, but that’s a future topic.)

The next mile marker in the journey is the idea of a *transformation* of that space using *operators*. The topic is big enough to take two posts to cover in reasonable detail.

This first post introduces the idea of (*linear*) *transformations*.

Continue reading

13 Comments | tags: linear algebra, matrix transform, QM101, quantum mechanics, vector space, vectors | posted in Math, Physics