Category Archives: Books

Catching Up

snowy woods

“Whose woods these are…”

I’m still working my way back to blogging. I likely won’t be fully back until my work life is behind me, but I am getting past the shock of finding out just how right I was about management’s view of me.  It’s been a week-and-a-half since I announced my intention to divorce them, and there has been nothing since the initial, “Oh, okay.”

It’s not unexpected. It’s not really even a surprise. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt.  I’ve realized that I am going through my second divorce. And both times it’s been due to the perception that my cons swamp my pros (and my prose).  What really stings is the sense of unfairness caused by so many others saying, “I don’t understand their thinking.”

Yeah, me either, but so it goes. Set it aside; I have some catching up to do.

Continue reading


Rick O’Shay

Back in the day, there was a comic strip that I really loved. It took place in the American old west in the small town of Conniption. The town was so small, it had only a deputy sheriff, Rick O’Shay. His best friend was a (reformed) gunslinger, Hipshot Percussion. The dance hall owner was Gaye Abandon, and the town doctor was Dr. Basil Metabolism. (Ya gotta love those names!)

The strip was called Rick O’Shay, and it was drawn by Stan Lynde.

Of course, we all love cowboys and the old west, but what made the comic a key part of my past was the spirituality of my favorite character, the gunslinger Hipshot.

Continue reading


The Colour of Magic

I’ve spent the last two weekends (and many weekday evenings) with an old, dear friend in a magical place. I can no longer remember how I found the place or how I was introduced to my friend. I do know that this year marks the 30-year anniversary of its founding. I think I’ve been here since the beginning. If not, it wasn’t long after.

So I’ve known and loved this place, and my friend, for long time. Remarkably, the charm has never left it. For three decades (or so) it has delighted me, impressed me, moved me and made me laugh out loud. It is for me the finest of the finest, my favorite favorite. There is none better and very few that come close.

I’m speaking of Terry Pratchett‘s wonderful Discworld books.

Continue reading


A Christmas Carol

Scrooge and MarleyMost of us have traditional ways of celebrating or observing the re-occurring events in our lives. An anniversary might call for dinner at a certain restaurant. A promotion or sale might call for buying a round of drinks. The great life milestones—births, graduations, weddings, retirements, deaths—all come heavily freighted with traditional behaviors.

For me, an important tradition at Christmas time is watching—and reading—the Charles Dickens classic, A Christmas Carol! I think it is one of the most engaging, endearing, wonderful and important stories ever. It is a story of redemption and re-discovery of lost joy. And it is an affirmation that how we choose to live our lives matters.

Plus it has ghosts!

Continue reading


ST:TOS, TAS, TNG, ENT

If you knew immediately what the title of this article means, you are almost certainly a Star Trek fan. You also know that a full list should contain DS9 and VOY. (And that, actually, there should be a ST: in front of each of them.)

If this all seems alphabet soup, here’s the deal. They’re all three-letter acronyms (TLAs) for the six different Star Trek TV series. This first article today begins “Star Trek Saturday” (a one-time event) here at Logos con carne. There are two or three ships still in dry dock… (big voice: …In Space) getting finishing touches for a launch later today.

To tantalize your taste buds, I’ll just mention that they concern galactic energy barriers, transporters and replicators. Those are ships of war; photon torpedoes loaded and primed. There is a third ship with a different mission that may also launch today. (Tantalized? Terrific!)

Continue reading


SF: Distress by Greg Egan

It’s official, I really like science fiction author Greg Egan!

Egan is among the modern science fiction authors; his first SF work, the short story Artifact, was published in 1983, so he’s been writing SF for about 28 years. Like many science fiction authors with a science or technical education, he writes non-fiction as well.

And here’s the thing: If you like your science fiction hard, you want to know about Greg Egan! He writes SF as hard as any I know. For instance, consider a novel (Incandescence) in which a key plot thread involves alien beings discovering (Einstein’s) General Relativity in a completely different way than Einstein did. He reminds me of Hal Clement on several levels, particularly so in the novel I just cited, as part of it is told from the aliens’ point of view (a common device in Clement’s work).

According to Wikipedia, Clement was the “leader of the hard science fiction sub-genre.” I would go along with that. There was a lesser-known author, George O. Smith, who wrote some extremely hard SF back in the day of radio tubes (the 40s). Venus Equilateral, a collection of short stories, is a must-read if you’re a high-tech SF fan, especially if you have any background in radio or electronics. Communications in space. With radio tubes! But I digress. My point is that Greg Egan could easily be the modern leader of hard SF.

And while I’ve only read two of his novels, a couple short stories and parts of his website, I’m hooked. It’s not just the ultra-hard SF; I like his writing and his characters, and I really like his ideas. Some of his stories involve alternate realities with different physics than ours. Others involve extremely advanced civilizations far in the future (for example, when we’ve conquered the galaxy and transcended our physical bodies to live as software).

Recently I read his novel, Distress. It was so engaging I read the entire 454 pages in one day (even missed the start of the ballgame). It’s hard not to get hooked on a novel that begins:

“All right. He’s dead. Go ahead and talk to him.”

That’s an opening that begs for explanation!

It turns out that the mystery behind those lines only serves to introduce the story’s main character. This opening scene involves a bit of science fiction that doesn’t have much direct connection with the main plot; it’s not unlike the opening scene of any James Bond movie.

Yet the level of hard science detail and imagination behind this “throw away” scene is impressive, and it’s what makes Egan’s work so attractive to geeks such as I.

I’m not going to explore the book’s plot; you can get a bit of that from its Wikipedia article (admittedly a scant description) or from Mr. Egan’s site (which also doesn’t have much plot detail). Better yet, just read it and let it unfold.  The Wiki article does at least touch on that this book is no mere adventure. As with all really good science fiction, the adventure is just wallpaper to the social commentary.

For one example, in the novel’s future there are five recognized genders among humans, and Egan introduces the neo-pronouns ve, ver and vis (for he, she, her and his) to accommodate gender-free speech.  I couldn’t help but remember a high school English teacher who offered the class an instant A for the year to anyone who could  come up with decent, useable gender-free pronouns.  I wonder if he would have accepted Egan’s?

There are some other parts of the book I want to mention. The first concerns the role of technology in modern society:

“It was a technical advance worth communicating, worth explaining, worth demystifying. … Once people ceased to understand how the machines around them actually functioned, then the world they inhabited began to dissolve into an incomprehensible dreamscape. Technology moved beyond control, beyond discussion, evoking only worship or loathing, dependence or alienation. Arthur C. Clarke had suggested that any sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from magic…”

While the novel takes place in the future, many people today have no idea how most of the technology that fills their world actually works. No idea at all. It’s not like having some vague idea about how a car engine works (and I imagine many people don’t). It’s seeing your cell phone or computer or TV as—literally—indistinguishable from a magical device.

Another part I want to remember considers the difference between religious and scientific pursuit. A character poses the question, ‘If modern human culture was wiped out, and the human race had to start fresh, what kinds of religious and scientific structures would be build?” That character goes on to suggest that the religious structures would likely differ considerably from those today. One proof of this might be the differences among modern and past religions.  On the other hand, the scientific structures would likely be very similar to what we have today. Mathematics, for example, is a universal language once the meanings behind the specific symbols are communicated.

The author’s point, obviously, is that science is based on the real world, and therefore all scientific structure converges on that reality. Religious structures, however, are deemed purely social inventions, and their structure depends on local social viewpoints.

If we do live in a godless universe, then the above is certainly true.  If we don’t, then one presumes that religious structures would tend to converge on their reality.  And by one account, you can argue they do: As I’ve mentioned before, all religions seem to me to share the twin ideas that (a) there is more to life than all this and (b) what you do in life, how you are, matters.  I might also argue the human tendencies to feel love and awe also reveal the fingerprint of something mystical.

Regardless, science does have the important and progressive feature of converging on the real world over time. Eventually phlogiston and epicycles and mysterious Pioneer accelerations reveal their incorrectness. It turns out that neutrinos do not go faster than light (not that anyone actually thought they did)!

Egan’s background in science gives his work a solid hard-sf foundation that I love. As I mentioned above, Incandescence deals with the invention of General Relativity! How cool is that?  (If you’re an über-geek, it’s mega-cool, even giga-cool.)  Distress involves the discovery of the “TOE” (Theory Of Everything) and what happens when you discover such a thing.

I will say that in the final chapters the scope of the book expands in a way that I have a little trouble with. Just not a fan of that sort of thing, I guess. Still, for any hard-sf fan, Distress, and Egan’s work in general: Two Thumbs Up!


SciFi: Two Important Things

And then there was one.

Last time, I wrote that my definition of science fiction is fiction with science + imagination. And that the science is freely defined to include guesses and completely made up, if not downright illegitimate, physics. In fact, that’s the imagination part of the equation. The fiction part is also freely defined, but basic story telling rules should apply. The science part must also play by certain rules, even when it’s made up science, even when it’s illegitimate

This article is about how I view the science and fiction in science fiction when it comes to playing by the rules. (Keep in mind that science fiction is art, and in art rules are made to be broken.)

Fantasy lovers take heart; in this case, my definition of science includes magic, the supernatural and the metaphysical. This uses the context of speculative fiction, which includes everything beyond current physics. The  fiction canvas is framed by any physics, or metaphysics, the story requires. Warp drive is no more real science than vampires or Norse Gods; all of them are fiction.

Anyway, there are…

Two Important Things (to me) in Science Fiction

The fiction part has to not make me mad.
The science part has to not make me mad.

In the end, it’s that simple; just don’t make me mad. Just don’t force me to recognize that what I am seeing has aspects that are preposterous. My suspension of disbelief is mighty, but not invincible. Don’t cut my cable; don’t take me out of the moment. I’ll do all I can to be a good audience… just don’t make me mad. That ruins it.

It gazes back.

You might object that this a good rule that applies to all fiction (if not all of life). I agree; it does apply, and it’s a bummer when the rule is broken. What might distinguish science fiction is that extension of reality into a not real place. That extension must happen or the story isn’t science fiction. But reaching beyond real physics can so easily put one on shaky ground or no ground at all. Fiction is hard enough without having to reinvent physics!

So, yes, any fiction can go awry, but I think the science part makes it more difficult to get right. Even though science here means speculation and includes fantasy, they all must obey their own internal logic as presented. If they don’t, it’s either cheating or a mistake, depending on whether it was intentional or not. Sometimes cheating is worth it, plus it’s hard to not make any mistakes with imaginary physics, so all-in-all science fiction is tough to write well.

Raquel Welch & other people.

It works the other way, by the way. The presence of the neat new science or fantasy idea can lead to fiction that is just bare scaffolding to support the cool idea (sometimes the scaffolding is ugly). A neat trick concept (like movie special  effects) only goes so far. The fiction should be the core of any story.

The Fiction

From one point of view, fiction is a lie. Where fiction lies, how it lies, why it lies; these are all part of the art of the fiction. The lies are necessary to tell the story. We accept the outer lies to appreciate the inner truths. We agree to suspend our disbelief (of the lies) in order to get the message.

It's PEOPLE!!

And while the text may not be true, it speaks truth. The best fiction communicates truth, even though the fiction itself is, well, fiction.

Another view separates information and story into truths, lies and fiction. In that view, fiction is a third kind of information—a story—that transcends the realm of true and false facts. Fiction contains truth and lies, but is neither. The distinction between information and story is the real distinction; it separates fiction from fact, truth and lies.

NOT the Wizard of Oz!

It is the line between documentaries and movies, biographies and novels, news photos and paintings. The former of each pair is judged as accurate (true) or not true. The latter are judged as stories; they are accurate only unto themselves.

In either view, fiction is highly varied in its creation and reception. This makes it difficult to judge except by general principles and your own tastes. (And, of course, there’s no accounting for taste.)  What remains is to discuss general principles. The principle, don’t make me mad, translates as, don’t push my disbelief too far. Much of what follows traces back to this principle.

Here’s some basic rulers I use to measure (science) fiction:

Ruler #0—Breaking a rule creatively is Good.

Thinking Outside The Box™ is highly sought and frequently punished. The idea is to break the rules in the right way, right time, right place. Story telling has rules. Some are general (“Play fair.”), some depend on the medium (rules about narrative, language, typography, color, editing, and so forth). Breaking a rule is just another artist’s brush.

Never Surrender; Never Give Up!

Ruler #1—Use the Right Rulers!

Stories can be entertaining , educational, both, or neither! Art can be just beautiful in execution or form (opera, poems, photos, sculpture, etc.). A cardinal Rule of Fiction is: Judge a story by its own yardstick. If a story sets out to be a “ripping good yarn” then judge on those merits. If a story sets out to send a message or prove a point, use a different yardstick. If the purpose is a moment of beauty, look at it with the heart. If it meant to make you laugh, did you?

Ruler #2—Follows its own Rules.

A story can make up any kind of reality it wants. But the story should play by the rules of its own reality. The story can break almost any real world rule, but it needs to account for it somehow. This is the one about not making me mad.

Great modern SF!

Ruler #3—Breaks New Ground.

I give extra points if a story takes me some place I’ve never been. The new ground can be an idea or a visual technique or a totally unexpected plot twist. Simply put, points for originality. This ruler is the “inside the box” version of the first one. It implies using traditional elements to explore new territory. The Zeroth ruler measures deconstruction; the last ruler measures exploration.

Of course, regarding all the above: the Zeroth (always) applies.

The Science

I want the science to not be so preposterous it ruins the moment. It’s really just Rule #2 again: “follow your own rules,” whatever they are. Just don’t make me mad.

Klaatu barada nikto

Real Science

As with most (but not all) fiction, most (but not all) science fiction takes place in the real world. By which I mean, this world, this universe, this physics. Stories taking place in this reality must obey—or account for disobeying—the physics of this universe.

For example, science fiction stories may require the ability to travel or communicate faster than light. Our physics considers these impossible, but for some science fiction stories, it’s a given. Star Trek has warp speed and transporters; Star Wars has hyper-drive and blasters. We accept that there is an implicit (or explicit in hard SF) explanation that makes it possible.

It’s all good; just don’t make me mad.

Gandalf before it all began

Magic

Science fiction stories sometimes have a form of science, called magic. Such stories are sometimes called speculative fantasy or speculative fiction, as that allows the new category, but keeps the potent letters: “S” and “F”!

There’s a fairly hard line between real and fantasy stories. Either the story exists in the strictly natural universe or it exists in a supernatural one. I’ve noticed three approaches:

  1. The supernatural exists. Ghosts; vampires; magic powers; all real.
  2. Something that seems “supernatural” turns out to be natural.
  3. The story remains agnostic and never declares itself.

The first two choices (certainly the first) declare an author’s point of view. The final choice leaves it open to the viewer. I’ve seen good stories told with all three views.

What's not to like?

Speculative fiction has its own wide variety of supernatural stories. Vampires are in vogue now, but SF covers a much larger fantasy territory. Wizards and sword-bearing heroes were once very popular. Some of the best comedy SF is fantasy; my very favorite is Terry Prachett‘s Discworld stories. I’ll explore that later along with other funny science fiction.

Stories that extend reality in bizarre ways are okay. Stories about magic are okay. All I ask is that they follow their own internal logic.

All I ask is, don’t make me mad!


What is Science Fiction?

I recently asked the question, “What is Art?” Answering that one is a real challenge, and the answer may be entirely subjective. This time I’m asking a question that is almost as difficult: “What is Science Fiction?” The answer may turn out to be just as subjective, and just as much of a challenge, but I’ve always thought the tough questions are the most interesting to explore.

I may, or may not, be an artist (but I know what I like!), and suffice to say I have only dabbled in art over the years. Science fiction, however, has filled my life as long as I’ve been picking my own reading material. I suspect that, overall, my fiction reading (and I read a lot of fiction) is at least 80% science fiction. It could be more. Most normal fiction leaves me disinterested, no matter how insightful it might be. I live in the real world; I want stories that take me far, far away, be it conceptually, spatially or temporally (if only temporarily). Only authors that bring something newly invented to the table really hold my interest.

Continue reading


I Want Alien Contact!

I want aliens to come to earth.

It’s going to be a very long time (if ever) that we go traipsing around the galaxy visiting others. If we do, of course we’ll be the aliens (which has made for some good SF stories and a recent cute film). Our tech is a long way from a galactic bus, so that’s one thing. Another thing is that we have no idea where to go. So far SETI hasn’t SEEN; for all we know we’re alone in the local universe.

You may have heard of the Drake Equation, which starts with the huge number of stars and calculates that even if a fraction of a fraction of a fraction (and so on, several times) of them have the conditions necessary, there are still many possible worlds with intelligent life. On the other hand, I have also heard the idea that the fractions are far too generous. It may be that each galaxy contains only a few places where intelligent life evolves. If that’s the case, we’re all the further from being–or receiving–visitors. (And if it’s as low as one per galaxy, we’re effectively alone in the cosmos. The distance to the nearest star is peanuts compared to the distance to the next galaxy!)

But still.  I want alien contact.

If other civilizations exist, there’s some chance they’re more advanced than we are and may have solved the problems of intergalactic travel. If not, then they’re stuck on their planet as we are on ours. But if so, then they could be traveling around, and there is some possibility (however small) that they could show up here.

Make no mistake. I’m not claiming they already have. I don’t believe in UFO stories or crop circles or pyramid-builders. (I suppose you can’t entirely rule out a highly advanced civilization that is secretly watching us in some fashion. But you’re talking about a vast commitment of energy and time to just hide in the bushes.)

Maybe someday aliens will present themselves to us, and there are several scenarios concerning what happens then.

In some movies, aliens are raving, maniacal beasts of some kind. I suppose it’s possible that raving, maniacal beasts could cross intergalactic space, but it seems unlikely. Crossing space is hard and requires smarts (and energy and time).  So a basic question is whether alien visitors would be more likely to be friendly or hostile.

One can argue that any race capable of crossing the void, and willing to do so, is likely to have good intentions. Advanced tech doesn’t necessarily imply advanced morals, but advanced intelligence might. If morality has a rational basis, and if intelligence correlates to rationality, then high intelligence may imply high morality.

But even the best intentions are not always enough. Steven Hawking has pointed out what happens on earth when societies with more advanced technology met societies without it. Things usually don’t go well for the latter. The question here is if a civilization advanced enough to cross intergalactic space might not be also advanced enough to handle first contact successfully. Certainly seems possible.

They may even have their own form of Star Trek‘s Prime Directive. We thought of it for a TV show decades ago; seems possible aliens might come up with it, too. (It’s interesting to note that in the earlier, more cowboy-like show, Kirk often, notoriously, did an end-run around the Prime Directive, but by the time Picard came around, our sensibilities had him honoring it. What might we think by the time we actually do achieve space travel?)

So, bottom line, I think aliens might be benign.  The scary possibility is that they could be harvesters.

There are certain elements that planets have limited amounts of. Iridium, Gallium, Helium, and lots of other ums. Mine it, refine it, use it all up, and there’s no more. Even if you recycle effectively, your civilization can grow to a point where it needs more of the material.

Then it can become an ‘us’ or ‘them’ problem, and sometimes intelligence is pretty good at rationalizing that ‘they’ aren’t ‘us,’ so therefore ‘they’ don’t really matter.

Plus… we really need that Iridium.

So if we ran into harvesters, that could be… bad.

One science fiction theme is that of getting caught in a galactic war of some kind. (If galactic politics is anything like ours, getting sucked in to that seems much worse.) One just has to think of small villages caught up in a war between two countries to imagine how that would go.

Another theme, ala The Day the Earth Stood Still, is that aliens come here to deal with a potentially dangerous species or to save us from ourselves or protect a few specimens of humans before we kill ourselves off. Or are wiped out to make room for an inter-galactic hyper-space bypass.

It’s also possible aliens will turn out to believe in God. And why not? It works both ways. If the universal apprehension humans seem to share is based on our psychology, that outlook may well be shared with alien races.  Why wouldn’t they share the perception of their small place in a big universe that begs us for purpose and meaning? Conversely, they may share the same real apprehension we do of an actual purpose and meaning. So if they do believe in a God, it won’t really answer anything either way.

The aliens in one of my favorite first contact stories, Contact, believed in God. They found it just as mysterious and wonderous as we do. The movie version, with Jodie Foster, is pretty good and very faithful to the book, but as is usually the case the book is much better. In fact, my favorite part of the book never made it into the movie. That’s the part about finding, deep, deep, deep in the digits of pi, a raster pattern of a circle.

Now that would appear to be God’s signature on His creation. That would tend to put an end to the question once and for all. Since pi is nothing more than the ratio between a circle’s radius and circumference, only controlling the creation and laws of the universe would scribe a message there.  (If you’ve read the book you know it turns out He actually treated His creation like a graffiti wall!)

Another idea from science fiction is finding a message in our “junk” DNA (as opposed to just finding a message in our junk). That message need not be from the Creator; it could just be from the Ancestors. (You have to admit, some Ancestor race seeding all those planets does nicely explain why all those alien species looked so very humanoid. So very human, in fact, that their women looked quite sexy!)

Let it also be said that aliens might also say, “Oh, that God stuff… haven’t outgrown that, yet, eh? Here, we can show you a few things that will clear that right up.”  Advanced knowledge comes in all sorts of packages. One can only hope that, along with definitively finding the “God Maker Circuit” in our heads, we also find the “Morality Determiner Circuit” as well.

So aliens could show up any day (or that SETI signal might finally come), and who knows what the outcome would be.  Certainly there are bad scenarios, and human experience this far might lead one to imagine the worst (Hawking seems to have). But I can also see it working out okay for us.  And it would sure break the monotony of life on our third rock.

So I want aliens!


Sideband #24: B.O.O.K

I’m a big fan of books and reading.

I have a rather large library that I’ve been dragging around for almost four decades. It grew by leaps and bounds in my younger days, but the growth rate has slowed in the last decade or so. (Slowed, but not stopped!) One of the bigger parts of moving has been getting enough boxes to pack the books, packing the books, unpacking the books, and deciding what to do about book shelves.

The damn shelves are a topic of their own. Book cases never seem to quite do what I want. I like the technique of mounting bracket rails on the wall and hanging shelves in interesting patterns. But that raises the topic of whether to leave the rails mounted or take them down and patch the holes. And the shelves themselves are an issue; the inexpensive pressed particle board ones tend to sag, but the nice strong pine boards are more expensive and require sanding and staining.

It’s a great deal of work for the simple pleasure of curling up with a book!

The digital age offers a new take on the whole book library thing. Video has gone from VHS to DVD to Blu-Ray to streaming. Music has gone from vinyl to eight-track to cassette to CD to iTunes and streaming. In both those cases, I’ve now purchased the same damn thing multiple times. (A favorite movie line of mine is Tommy Lee Jones in Men in Black, “Now I have to buy the White Album again!”)

I’m still on the first generation of book technology, and it’s looking like it’s time to buy the White Album with regard to reading material.  With that in mind, along with a life-long love of books, here’s a piece that’s been taking up bits on various hard drives for a long, long time (author unknown, and much edited by m’self):

B.O.O.K™

Introducing the new Bio-Optic Organized Knowledge device (BOOK™)!

Compact and portable, it can be used anywhere—at the beach, on a bus, or even sitting in an armchair by a fire. Even small children are able to operate one with almost no training. Yet it is powerful enough to hold as much information as a CD-ROM disc. Here’s how it works:

BOOK is constructed of sequentially numbered sheets of paper (recyclable), each capable of holding thousands of bits of information. The pages are locked together with a custom-fitted device called a cover, which keeps the pages in their correct sequence. Opaque Paper Technology (OPT) allows manufacturers to use both sides of the sheet of paper, doubling the information and cutting costs. BOOK sheets can store images as readily as they store text, and no special software is required.

Experts are divided on the prospects for further increases in information density; for now, a BOOK with more information simply uses more pages. Each sheet is scanned optically, registering information directly into the user’s brain. A flick of the finger takes the user to the next page.

BOOK may be taken up at any time and used merely by opening it. BOOK never crashes or requires rebooting. Like other devices the data can become corrupted if coffee or soda is spilled on it, and generally BOOKs will not survive immersion in water. Severe misuse can also cause permanent damage rendering the BOOK unreadable.

BOOK is random access: the “browse” feature allows you to move instantly to any sheet and move forward or backward as quickly as you wish. Many BOOKs come with an “index” feature, which pinpoints the exact location of any selected information for instant retrieval.

An optional “BOOKmark” accessory allows the user to open BOOK to the exact place last used in a previous session, even if BOOK has been closed. BOOKmarks fit universal design standards; thus a single BOOKmark can be used in BOOKs of various manufacturers. Conversely, numerous BOOKmarks can be used in a single BOOK if the user wants to store numerous views at once; the number is limited only by the number of pages in the BOOK.

The user can also make personal notes next to BOOK text entries with an optional programming tool, the Portable Erasable Nib Cryptic Inter-communication Language Stylus (PENCILS). A Portable non-Erasable Nib Stylus (PENS) may also be used to store permanent notation.

Portable, durable and affordable, BOOK is being hailed as the precursor of a new entertainment wave. The appeal of BOOK seems so certain that thousands of content creators have committed to the platform and investors are reportedly flocking to invest.

Look for a flood of new titles soon!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 316 other followers